Tag Archives: The Future

A Destiny

Foreword

Come from the country, from a very small town in North Essex, I have been asked why I am where I am today: a mitred archpriest of the Russian Church and rector of one of the largest Orthodox churches in England, which is in my native city. I have been persecuted and slandered by cruel and evil men for telling the truth, and sent by Divine Providence to the Moldovan part of the most hospitable and friendly Romanian Church, whose Moldovan Archbishop is the kindest bishop I have ever met. As one of our many Russian parishioners, who has known me for over sixteen years wrote to me just now: ‘You have gone from thorns to the stars’. However, the answer to the question why I am here is in four revelations that came to me long ago.

Revelation One: Childhood

In childhood I was influenced of course by my parents, my two elder brothers, grandparents, relatives, friends, schoolteachers and fellow pupils. The third child of a third child father and a third child mother, a great many of my relatives were Victorians from the century before last. From them and from all the local people, especially from the older ones, I obtained a keen historical sense. In childhood three people influenced me especially, an aunt and two elderly people, who were unofficially called saints by others. Although they were all Christians, they would not have called themselves Protestants or Catholics. They had been illuminated from on high. There were five other local people who influenced me in particular in early childhood, who were officially called saints by others. These were: Sts Albright (794), Cedd (664), Osyth (c. 700), Edmund (869) and Audrey (679), who had all lived in England’s golden age of holiness, within 250 years of one another.

I asked myself why there had not been any saints in England for nearly a millennium? Why had the Holy Spirit, whose fruit is the saints, dried up? What had gone wrong in the history of England? Why did the Establishment version of English history begin with the catastrophic defeat of England by Papally-blessed Norman Viking thugs in 1066, when I knew about King Alfred the Great, who loved other peoples and had converted the English Vikings to Christ nearly 200 years before? Why did the Norman-founded Establishment insist on calling the English ‘Anglo-Saxons’, when they never called themselves that? Why did the English write afterwards that the Norman massacres were so terrible that it seemed as though ‘Christ and His saints slept’? And how was Old England overlaid and concealed by a disreputable Britain and then British Empire? Here were questions to which I sought to find answers in many places and from many people.

Revelation Two: The Wars

Born in the middle of the last century, I grew up with my grandfather, who told me about his First European War in Baghdad, Jerusalem and Thessaloniki. And I grew up with my father, who told me stories of his Second European War in Egypt, Libya, Algeria, Italy, Austria and elsewhere. Snatched from a quiet and peaceful country home for military service and sent abroad, he saw what the British Empire actually was. He had had no idea what it was and had only been told something about a civilising mission. Instead, he found in Egypt, Sierra Leone and South Africa a thieving, corrupt and racist crime regime, which exploited the native peoples. Yes, the British drank tea from China in ‘china’ cups, but it had been paid for with African slaves and Indian opium and millions of lives had ruthlessly been destroyed. That was the Empire. My father also explained to me that the then British Prime Ministers are only puppets of the Zionist Empire – as they still are, all come from the same factory.

Revelations Three and Four: Christ and Russia

At the end of childhood, when I was twelve years old, I received a double revelation, when I saw my future. This came to me when I saw a film which opened with a scene of spiritual immediacy. This was a scene with a Russian priest conducting a funeral. After this, I simultaneously read the Gospels and began to teach myself Russian. All had become clear to me, except for the details.

Afterword

Aged twelve, I knew God’s will for me, my destiny, though I did not know when and how, who and what. The rest has only been putting two and two together. Fundamentally, nothing has changed. Today I am still waiting for the Russian Church to find its freedom. It has wonderful saints and martyrs, but its pastors have been suppressed by politicians and I am unlikely to see it free in my lifetime. 300 years have passed, but it is still subject to the rule of Caesar, to Imperialists, to Soviets, to the CIA, to the evil anti-missionary careerists, and to all the rest who oppose Christ. The greatest saint and missionary of the Russian emigration, St John of Shanghai and Western Europe, was essentially martyred by the ecclesiastical politicians of the USA.

 

Those who would like to know more can obtain the book Paradise Just Beyond: Fragments of an Autobiography, 1956-2026, 168 pages, A5, spiral-bound. This will be available in August from frandrew_anglorus@yahoo.co.uk for £5 or $10 from overseas, payable by Paypal.

 

 

108 Years of Treason and Cowardice and Deceit

The Romanov throne was destroyed not by young bomb-throwers or forerunners of the Soviets, but by the bearers of aristocratic surnames and court titles, bankers, publishers, lawyers, professors and other public figures.

Chapter 16 of the Memoirs of Grand Duke Alexander Mikhailovich

Foreword

We are now in the fifth year of the disastrous and tragic war between Russia and the Ukraine. Between one and two million soldiers are dead. Of one thing we can be certain, this war would never have happened, indeed it would have been unthinkable, in the time of Tsar Nicholas II, because he represented not petty and hateful nationalist division, but multinational peace and unity.

In the meantime, pray for Amvrosy and Vladislav, young men in their twenties, dragged off the streets of Kiev by violent and overpaid thugs of the regime two weeks ago and now forced to the Front after two days’ training. They do not want to die needlessly. They do not want to fill the pockets of Ukrainian officials, warmongering Western politicians and arms-dealers with billions of dollars. Their only hope is surrender to the vastly superior Russian forces. Their mothers of these two young men, who live near my house in Kiev, are frenetic. But at least D. is safe in Portugal, and so is his brother in Norway. They got out in time over the mountains. Lord have mercy! Let us now return to our subject.

Slandered by Propaganda

Nicholas II is one of the most slandered people in history. He most certainly was not weak, indecisive, incompetent, stupid, or dominated by others, as atheist Western and Soviet propaganda portray. Every attempt to slander him with lies has been overturned. Thus, the tragic stampede after his Coronation, leaving 1,389 dead resulted from aristocratic incompetence, compared to the 2015 stampede in Saudi Arabia which left at least 2,400 dead; the unprovoked attack on Russia by Japan was plotted by the Western Powers and turned into a costly Russian victory, with Japan bankrupted by costly Western arms.

As for the 100 and more who died from the crowd of 3,000 in 1905, that was nothing to do with the Tsar – he was not even in Saint Petersburg when Marxists hid behind stolen church banners and icons ‘in a peaceful demonstration’ and opened fire on troops, who returned fire; the terrorist revolts of 1905 and their 9,000 victims were the result of guns smuggled into Russia for atheist revolutionaries paid to destroy Russia. As for World War I, this was the fault of Berlin, which supported the Austro-Hungarian attempt to genocide the South Slav peoples, and had been planning a War for years.

Socio-Economic Success

Even before he was crowned, Nicholas had worked for the completion of the Trans-Siberian Railway and the remarkable opening up and settling of largely empty Siberia. Nicholas II reigned over an accelerating Industrial Revolution that led to a nearly 50% rise in the ever more prosperous Imperial population. This was accompanied by eleven reforms, including the huge agrarian reform, the reform which led to the massive growth of free education and literacy, which had reached 56% by 1916, and the introduction of a free health service in 1898, 50 years before the UK, and a social security and justice system.

The Tsar was a radical moderniser, who reigned over the electrification of his Empire, with the development of hydroelectricity, submarines, rocketry, radio, the first helicopter designs, monoplanes and bomber aircraft. Under the Tsar life expectancy reached 68. By 1913 he had brought Russian Imperial agriculture to be Europe’s breadbasket and its economy to be the world’s fourth largest, which is what it is again only today. By all accounts, by 1950, when the Tsar would have been 82 years old, the Russian economy would have overtaken that of every other nation, including that of the USA.

Foreign Policy

In foreign policy Nicholas II was the only world leader who promoted international peace, founding the Hague Peace Conference in 1899 and, though mocked, was called ‘the apostle of peace’. This was the beginning of many international treaties and the regulation of war. He had an excellent double education in law and military affairs, knew European history very well and spoke five European languages fluently. He also defended nations as diverse as Thailand, Ethiopia, Morocco, Persia, Tibet, Afghanistan, Hawaii and the Boers from aggressive Western colonisation and asset-stripping.

The Tsar also tried to find peace in the warring Balkans, with their divisive German puppet-kings, through establishing a Balkan Union. His diplomacy had long been successful in avoided the international conflict that the warmongering Western nations wanted to start in powderkeg Europe with its rival imperialisms in 1912 and 1913. His policy here was to balance each nation against the other. That he finally failed in this was not his fault. Tragically, it was not possible to stop the European attempt at suicide, when Europe absolutely wanted to commit suicide.

Projected Spiritual Reform

The Tsar wanted to debureaucratise the Church administration, which had opposed the canonisation of St Seraphim of Sarov, and to restore the Patriarchate. He failed, as he was opposed by the petty ambitions, jealousies, rivalries and quarrels of the State-loving episcopate. He had little time for the empty ritualism of a Church, where if anyone who took communion more than once a year would be eyed as a fanatic. He defended the pious name-glorifiers of Mt Athos, who were hated by loveless episcopal bureaucrats, who were backed by the largely atheist aristocrats. Both groups betrayed him in 1917.

He saw eighty-one saints canonised in twenty years against only five canonised in the previous 175 years. By 1917 there were 1,256 monasteries, against only 631 in 1890, 117 million Orthodox, with 163 bishops, over 115,000 priests and deacons and 78,767 churches – against only 39,700 in 1890. Tsar Nicholas made generous personal gifts to all the Local Churches which he wanted to free from ethnic narrowness. By 1898 there were 22,000 Orthodox in Japan, Orthodox missions in Korea and China, and seventeen churches had been built in major Western cities, including in Nice and New York.

A Military Genius

Nicholas II, a military man by training, was forced to become commander-in-chief of the Russian forces in August 1915, replacing his utterly incompetent and foul-mouthed overgrown cousin. That was the treasonous Grand Duke Nicholas, a snobbish, atheistic and anti-Semitic aristocrat, who treated his despised troops as cannon fodder, just like the Allied generals on the Western Front. His incompetence had led to the shell shortage and the retreat from the Carpathians in early 1915. Having taken 2 million Austro-Hungarian prisoners, by 1916 Tsar Nicholas had won the greatest Allied victory of the War.

If only his timid General Brusilov had had the courage to follow through on the Tsar’s carefully planned breakthrough in 1916, Austria-Hungary could have been knocked out of the war. Russian troops would have liberated both Vienna and Berlin by 1917. Unlike Napoleon who reached Moscow and later Hitler who almost did, the enemy in World War One did not reach Russia. They only occupied eastern Poland, Lithuania and what is now Catholic western Ukraine and western Belarus, where satanic anti-Jewish pogroms had taken place – none took place in Russia, though huge ones took place in Berlin and Vienna.

His armies suffered only some 50% of the casualties of the Allies on the immobile Western Front. This was despite the fact that his troops faced the vast majority of the German Army on a highly mobile Front that was half as long again as the Western, as well as facing the Austro-Hungarians and the Ottomans. Nicholas II failed on the very verge of victory in early 1917, as Churchill recorded. However, he failed only because of the ‘treason and cowardice and deceit’, as the Tsar described it, of decadent and Russophobic aristocrats, corrupt generals and bureaucrat-bishops, supported by the ‘Allies’.

Afterword

When Tsar Nicholas and his family were murdered 108 years ago on 17 July 1918, the order for it had gone out from financiers in New York. The victim of ‘treason and cowardice and deceit’, the world is still suffering from his murder. Without his overthrow, there would not have been a World War Two, let alone today’s tragedy. Without that, we would be living in a far different world.

Of this St John of Shanghai and Western Europe, who proposed his canonisation in the mid-1930s, wrote: ‘That blackest crime, which was committed against the Tsar, must be effaced by fervent veneration for him, glorifying his feat. The Russian Lands must kneel down before the humiliated, the slandered and the martyred….Then the Passion-Bearing Tsar will be granted great boldness before God and his prayer will save the Russian Lands from the disasters borne by them….Innocently shed blood will regenerate Russia….A restored Russia is needed by the world, which has lost the spirit of life and trembles with fear, as before an earthquake’.

17 July 2026

 

 

 

 

The Post-Western World and the Post-Fascist Western World

After the sacrificial victory of the peoples of the USSR over Nazism which murdered 27 million of them, and the ever more obvious and humiliating capitulations of the West after 1945, in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan and now in West Africa, Iran and the Ukraine, we began entering the post-Western world. This is a world that is no longer controlled by the Western elites. Even their technology and infrastructure have fallen behind those of China, Russia and Iran, as the Western economy has been overtaken by the economies of India, Indonesia, Brazil, Turkiye and Mexico. These countries, and others, are banding together in the BRICS concert of sovereign, but co-operating nations.

This means that we have entered a multipolar world, in which the USA and its vassal-states in the Western half of Europe and Australasia have put the countries they control at serious risk of being permanently left behind. This is the result of their quite unwarranted, racist superiority ideology. In short, we are returning to the Pre-Western world, to the world of a millennium ago, as it was before the rise of the Western elite, who little by little came to control and manipulate first the Western peoples, and then most other peoples, through their Fascist rule, from which so many millions died. Enough is enough. We are now gradually moving towards the Post-Fascist Western world.

And this means moving back to the Pre-Fascist West. In other words, the circle is being closed. The Pre-Fascist West is the West of a millennium ago, before the Western peoples were herded into submission and propagandised by barbarian and pagan elites, who behaved as mafia gangsters with their castles, camps and knights. The phases of their Fascist control techniques of divide and rule and bread and circuses have gone from Feudalism to Imperialism, from Capitalism to Marxism, from Nazism to Globalism. These proclaim that: ‘We are superior to you all and therefore we have the right to massacre you and exploit you and you must bow down before us and capitulate to us’.

We can see this quite clearly in the case of Russia. The West, which was superior to it only in its military technology, told Russians at the end of the seventeenth century that, as Slavs, they were fit only to be ‘slaves’. They were an inferior, backward, primitive, militaristic, aggressive, cruel, violent, devious, untrustworthy mass of evil, stupid, drunken savages, so servile that they welcomed oppression and tyranny. In fact, that was an exact description of the savage West. These stereotypes were those of universal Western racism – the same stereotypes were used for Blacks, Reds, Browns and Yellows, Africans, Native Americans, Hindus, Chinese, and all who are not of the Western elite.

Although today the Russian Federation has by PPE for some time been the world’s fourth largest economy and the largest economy in Europe, it was in the late seventeenth century that Russia began losing its roots and patriotic identity and accepted the Western nonsense. The inferiority complex had begun. First, it copied Western Feudalism and then its Imperialism. Its Westernised rulers, Peter I and then the German Catherine II, enforced Western Feudalism, serfdom and conquest, which its Westernised elite so much admired, as it benefited them. In the nineteenth century, the same elite adopted the next phase of the Western ideology of exploitation, Capitalism.

Peasants and workers alike were ruthlessly exploited by the ultra-rich elite. Despite the bold attempts to regulate the excesses of Capitalism by the Tsars and to work for social justice, the decadent Westernised aristocracy, who ruled the country unjustly provoked the adoption in 1917 of another Western ideology, Marxism. Although this ideology killed off the uniquely Western elitist ideology of Nazism after it had invaded Russia, that success came only by starting the long return of Russia to its roots and patriotic identity. Marxism failed to provide what it had promised, bankrupted Russia and fell. Thus, Russia was tempted by the final phase of Western Fascist ideology, called Globalism.

After over thirty-five years of Globalism, which brought Western oligarchy, tyranny, corruption and narcissism into Russia, it too has been rejected as anti-patriotic, as proved by its treacherous role in the conflict against the Globalist Nazi NATO in its proxy war in the rootless Ukraine. Although the remnants of Globalism survive in the tyranny and corruption of pro-Stalinist Russian oligarchs, still stuck in the Soviet past, not least the bandits who seized power in the still unSovietised Church elite, a deWesternised future is clear. And that means the full return to the Pre-Westernised Russia, so admired and desired by Tsar Nicholas II, who in 1917 was overthrown precisely for that by the West.

The Pre-Westernised Russia means a Russia which has Sovereignty and therefore secure borders, because Sovereignty, not vassaldom, is the precondition for economic prosperity. This means that the country is ruled by a government which has stability and continuity, as it has the best interests of the people at heart. This allows free enterprise, but not the law of the jungle with its huge gulf between rich and poor of the Western Globalist parasitic oligarchic system. This means social justice, but also opportunities for all. Such a government and people have their roots and identity in traditional spiritual and moral values, which provide social, family and personal stability.

The New World Order

The Past

The whole contemporary world has been shaped for the last millennium by the imperialism and technology of ‘the West’, also called ‘the Western world’. Although this began as a narrow racial and geographical European unit, founded by the Franks and ruled by Karl the Tall (in French called Charlemagne), it became an ideological construct – from local it went global. Thus, today we can find ‘Frankish Westerners’ of all races, in Japan, Australia, Argentina, and all over the world. Conversely, we can also find many who oppose the ‘West’ as an ideology, in the West itself and all over the world.

The Western Millennium: 992-1492-1992

‘The West’ in the ideological sense was born over a millennium ago. It began with 500 years of overland territorial expansion from the Frankish centre, from where is now the Franco-German border, moving out from its Rhineland ‘Carolingian’ (Charlemagne) base. It expanded first to what is now Central and Eastern Europe, then to Southern Italy and Iberia, then to the ‘Conquest’ of the British Isles and Ireland from 1066 on, to Scandinavia, to Palestine from 1096 on, and then to the Western Russian borderlands (borderlands in Slav languages = ukraina). This process played out from 992 to 1492.

The Western expansionists realised in the fifteenth century that their attempted conquests towards the east had failed, successfully resisted and frustrated by Orthodox Christendom and Islam. Therefore, the expansionists, initially also called by the Spanish word ‘conquistadors’, who in January 1492 had reconquered Granada and so completing the reconquest of Iberia, turned westwards. Thus opened 500 years of overseas expansion, westwards to the Americas and south-eastwards to Africa, Asia and finally to Oceania, so encircling Russia and Islam, starting in July 1492 and ending in 1992.

That millennium of expansion finally ended in 1992, after the fall of the USSR, which had been founded on the Western materialist ideology of Marxism, accepted by Russians who had lost their Faith. It ended because all the West’s attempts after 1992 to continue its overseas expansion, including that of its Israel settler colony, failed, from Iraq to Afghanistan, from the Ukraine to Yemen, from Gaza to Iran. So began the self-isolation of the West, which no longer had any credit, in contrast to the great popularity of President Putin, in Russia, Asia, Africa and Latin America, as well as in parts of Western Europe.

The World Millennium

So, with the fall of the atheist USSR, began the World Millennium – the New World Order of BRICS. This went back to the vision of Primakov in newly independent Russia in 1998, the failed US coup in Kiev in 2004-2005, President Putin’s Munich Speech in 2007 and his defence of South Ossetia from US proxies in 2008, BRICS marked the New World Order. It was formally founded in 2009 in Russian Ekaterinburg, set between Europe and Asia, the City of the Imperial Martyrs, who were executed by order from New York. Today BRICS, not New York, is the real United Nations, the Concert of Sovereign Nations.

Thus, BRICS China is now set to become the leader of East Asia, including eventually Japan, a United Korea, the Philippines, Vietnam and all South-East Asia, Indonesia and south-eastwards to Oceania. BRICS Iran is now set to become the leader of the whole of largely Muslim West Asia. If it can overcome its Hindu nationalism, BRICS India can become the leader of all South Asia. And as for Russia, if it too can overcome the Imperialist and Soviet hangover of divisive centralism and nationalism, BRICS Russia can become the leader of North Asia, more often called Eurasia. East, West, South and North.

Eurasia includes all of Europe, from Reykjavik to Dublin, London, Lisbon across Europe and Siberia, eastwards to Vladivostok, from the Atlantic to the Pacific. Slovakia, Serbia and Hungary have already understood. First, however, its Church must be cleansed of its Soviet centralism, nationalism and corruption, planted by divide and rule Western ideologies and accepted by greedy and corrupt Russian would-be oligarchs. It must also overcome the assassination operation of its New York section, which parallels the Phanar operation, both CIA-run, and so both hating the independent Romanians and Moldovans.

The Future?

Only once it has resolved its own transatlantic moral decay, could Russia then begin to accept the independence of all Non-Russian Orthodox, starting with the Ukrainians, and then reverse the moral decay of Western Europe North America and Oceania by repentant example. Africa, Latin America and Oceania will follow China, Iran, India and Russia, as South Africa and Brazil are already trying to do, and as the BRICS peoples of Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia and the Arab Emirates want. Then the different spheres of civilisation will at last become spheres of security and spheres of peace and co-operation.

I Had a Dream: Twelve Days that Would Shake the Orthodox World

Moscow, Wednesday 1st, The Ascension Thursday 2nd, and Friday 3rd June

After the Liturgy for the Leavetaking of Pascha and the resignation of the previous Patriarch, Metropolitan Pavel was elected Patriarch of the Russian Orthodox (ROC). The first act of the Patriarch and his Synod was to rename the Soviet-era ‘Moscow Patriarchate’ ‘the Patriarchate of New Jerusalem and All Russia’ and to move his administration to the New Jerusalem Monastery outside Moscow for deSovietisation. Then the Synod refrocked all who had been defrocked for political reasons by the old regime and cleansed the Church by defrocking ‘the princes of the Church’, placed there by the old regime. These were all the corrupt careerists, thieves and sadists, who had humiliated and persecuted faithful priests and people, the sexually disturbed narcissists, intellectuals, homosexuals, pedophiles and psychopaths who hated married priests, women and children.

After the Ascension Feast Liturgy, Patriarch Pavel set up four new Autocephalous Local Churches. These new Churches were: the Kievska Rus Church (for the new Ukraine), the Belarussian Church, the Baltic Church (for Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania) and the Central Asian Church (for the five stans of Central Asia). Also the OCA (Orthodox Church in America), founded by Moscow, was renamed the NAOC (Northern American Orthodox Church). The ROC gave up its Northern American parishes to the NAOC, those in Oceania to the Patriarchate of Constantinople, those in South America and those in Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean to the Patriarchate of Antioch, and all those in Western Europe and Hungary to the Patriarchate of Romania. They also told the rogue, schismatic ROCOR group that it had one year to follow or be excommunicated.

Finally, the Patriarch also transformed the Church’s Department of External Relations into the Department of Inter-Orthodox Relations. On Friday afternoon the new Patriarch left Moscow and proceeded with his delegation to Istanbul for reconciliation and the renewal of concelebration with the Patriarchate of Constantinople and the other Greek-speaking Churches.

Istanbul, Saturday 4th, Sunday 5th and Monday 6th June

After the resignation of the previous Patriarch, Bishop Petros was elected Patriarch of the Patriarchate of Constantinople. The first act of the Patriarch and his Synod was to cleanse the Church by defrocking ‘the princes of the Church’, placed there by the old regime. These were all the corrupt careerists, freemasons, thieves and sadists, who had humiliated and persecuted faithful priests and people, the sexually disturbed narcissists, intellectuals, homosexuals, pedophiles and psychopaths who hated married priests, women and children. Then Patriarch Petros and his Synod abandoned the fake ‘Church’ in the Ukraine, which had been known as the OCU, and told them to join the canonical Church. It then decided to recognise and concelebrate with the Patriarchate of New Jerusalem and all 20 Autocephalous Churches, including the four new ones.

Finally, all agreed to establish a new Autocephalous Church for Oceania, also giving its parishes in Northern America to the NAOC, giving up parishes in South America, and those in Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean, to the Patriarchate of Antioch, and those in Western Europe and in Hungary to the Patriarchate of Romania, where new Local Churches would be established.

Alexandria, Tuesday 7th and Wednesday 8th June

After the resignation of the previous Patriarch, Bishop Moses was elected Patriarch of the Patriarchate of Alexandria. Born in Uganda, he is the first black Patriarch of Africa. The first act of the Patriarch and his Synod was to cleanse the Church by refrocking those who had been defrocked for political reasons and defrocking ‘the princes of the Church’, placed there by the old regime. These were all the corrupt careerists, freemasons, thieves and sadists, who had humiliated and persecuted faithful priests and people, the sexually disturbed narcissists, intellectuals, homosexuals, pedophiles and psychopaths who hated married priests, women and children. He replaced all these with black African bishops. Then Patriarch Moses decided to move his administration to Nairobi, the Church keeping its ancient title as the Patriarchate of Alexandria and All Africa.

A number of Greek, Cypriot and Russian bishops were appointed to continue to serve in the Patriarchate as consultants. However, the Church is now dominated by African bishops, selected from the local clergy, who are spread out all over the African Continent. A plan has been drawn up to greatly expand their numbers, which is vital to the Africa-wide spread of the Church.

Cisinau, Thursday 9th and Friday 10th June

The Moldovan President greeted Patriarch Pavel of Moscow, Patriarch Daniel of Bucharest, their delegations, and both Metropolitans of the two still separate parts of the Moldovan Church. As nationwide democratic referenda had already been organised on self-determination, the results were announced. Apart from Transnistria in the far east, Gagauzia in the far south and a small area in the far north, which all transferred to Russia, over 80% of Moldovans had voted to join the Republic of Romania, their new region to be called the Autonomous Republic of Bessarabia. Following this decision, Orthodox in Bessarabia joined the Autonomous Bessarabian Metropolia under the Church of Romania. Patriarch Daniel accepted this and agreed to lead the formation of a Western European Orthodox Church and also a Local Church of Carpatho-Rus and Hungary.

In return, Patriarch Daniel ceded Romanian Orthodox parishes in Northern America to the NAOC, the few parishes in Latin America, and the few in Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean to the two new Churches to be organised there by the Patriarchate of Antioch, and those in Oceania to the new Church to be organised there by the Patriarchate of Constantinople.

Bucharest, Saturday 11th and Sunday 12th June, the Great Council and Pentecost

At the new Cathedral of National Salvation in Bucharest, the largest Orthodox Cathedral in the world, all the leaders of the Local Churches held the Great Council of the whole Orthodox Church. There Patriarch Petros announced that his Patriarchal administrative centre would move to Thessaloniki, as the Church of Greece, centred in Athens, was merging with the Patriarchate after the uncanonical British-enforced separation of Greece some 200 years before. Thus, the episcopate of the old Church of Greece joined the renewed and cleansed Patriarchate of Constantinople and All Greece. The Church of Cyprus was represented by its new head, after the resignation in Nicosia of the old Archbishop of Cyprus. The Patriarch of Jerusalem announced a renewed episcopate, dominated by several Palestinian bishops and a Russian and a Romanian bishop.

In this way the Diptychs of the Church were renewed, listing 24 Local Churches in all, nine new. Thus, after the Great Council, on that great day of the Feast, the Feast of Pentecost, Sunday 12th June, all 24 Patriarchs, Metropolitans and Archbishops of the 24 Local Churches, old and new, concelebrated in the Cathedral for the first time: of Constantinople, New Rome and All Greece, of Alexandria and All Africa, of Antioch and All the East, of Jerusalem and All Palestine, of Georgia, of New Jerusalem and All Russia, of Serbia, of Romania and All Bessarabia, of Bulgaria, of Cyprus, of Albania, of Poland, of the Czech Lands and Slovakia, of Northern America, of Macedonia, of Kievska Rus, of Belarus, of the Baltics, of Central Asia, of Western Europe, of Carpatho-Rus and All Hungary, of South America, of Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean, and of Oceania.

 

Towards the Future Local Orthodox Church of Western Europe

The Reconstitution of the Lost Local Church of Western Europe

For over fifty years we have actively prayed and worked for the restoration of the Local Orthodox Church of Western Europe. Unlike future Local Churches in the Americas and Oceania, this would be a spiritual restoration of what existed here, before the 11th century schism from the Orthodox Church by the Latin-speaking Patriarchate of Rome. Clearly, this would not be a literal restoration, which is impossible without a time machine – to think otherwise is the error of Western riters. Thus, in the 11th century, Old Rome fell. Meanwhile, New and Christian Rome had been established as the Capital of the Empire, on the edge of Europe, looking towards Asia, and that did not fall. The Western provinces had fallen to provincialism, so breaking off from the Christian Capital. (Indeed, in 1204 the Western barbarians sacked and looted the Christian Capital).

Old Rome fell because it had taken on the imperialism of the Pagan Roman Emperors, imposed by admiring barbarian Frankish leaders. The new 11th century Patriarchs (‘Papae’) of Old Rome, all Franks, claimed absolute authority over the whole Church, notably in the ‘Dictatus Papae’ of the German Hildebrand in 1075. Thus, the Pope became the ‘Pontifex Maximus’, the only intermediary between God and man. This was expressed in the invention by Old Rome of the filioque ideology of the second half of the 11th century. This claims that the Holy Spirit, the power and authority of God, proceeds from the replacement/vicar of the Son of God on earth, which that Patriarch claimed to be. This was in order to justify his universal power grab, expressed in the contradictory claim that he was both ‘Roman’ and yet ‘Catholic’.

They would eventually even declare that the Popes of Rome are infallible, though that was already inherent in the manifesto of 1075. Repaganised, Old Rome had made itself into the provincial ‘Roman Catholic’ Empire with absolute authority, cutting itself off from the Church in 1054. At once protests began within its territory of Western Europe, which was dominated by the Latin and Germanic peoples. These protests were met as ‘heresies’ with violent persecutions and inquisitions by what had once been a Church hierarchy, now a wealthy, feudalised and sadistic elite of ‘Princes of the Church’, who led armies and massacred freely. Eventually those protests resulted in the defection of a majority of the Germanic peoples and, initially especially, of others in the 16th century ‘Protestant Reformation’, in fact a ‘Deformation’.

Thus, Western Europe was controlled by Roman Catholicism and Protestantism, which errors were later exported to European overseas colonies, carrying division worldwide. Today, Roman Catholicism remains, despite the scandals of pedophilia and financial corruption, but Protestantism is dying out much more rapidly. National Protestant Churches, like the National Churches of Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, England, Scotland, Wales and Ireland, as well as other Protestant groups like Methodists and Quakers are simply closing down and disappearing. However, the question remains as to which of the Local Orthodox Churches could lead the restoration of the Local Church of Western Europe by gathering all Orthodox and those of goodwill together, and not imposing some narrow nationalist politics?

Which Local Church Will Lead the Reconstitution?

The centralising and nationalist ideologues of the Greek Patriarchate of Constantinople have never actually been interested in doing this, despite certain of its frustrated bishops and clergy showing such an interest. In reality, that Patriarchate has been so dominated by politics and hence so spiritually weak that its Vatican-visiting leadership appears to want to be a minor department of Roman Catholicism, only Greek-speaking and Greek nationalist. Personally, I realised this in 1982 after talking with the late Fr John Romanides, totally isolated in his views, though he was still captivated by Hellenism (Greek nationalism). His isolation was due to the domination of the episcopate of his Patriarchate by politicians, ‘Princes of the Church’, not by men of Faith, the authentic shepherds of the flock, like Sts Spyridon and Nicholas.

From 1982 on, if not before, I had hoped that the Russian Church would take the lead in the construction of a new Local Church, despite its threefold Diaspora divisions. For this, the Diaspora divisions would first have to be overcome and so I worked towards this throughout the 80s, 90s and 2000s. I helped to oppose secularising modernist and ecumenist liberalism, on the one hand, and censorious old calendarist and obscurantist phariseeism on the other hand. We saw great hope when came the fall of the atheist USSR in 1991. This was followed by the admirable 2000 Jubilee Council in Moscow with at long last the first canonisations of New Martyrs and Confessors and the 2003 statement of Patriarch Alexiy II regarding a future Western European Church. Finally, came the triumph of Russian Diaspora unity in 2007 and 2019.

However, in 2022 the CIA decided otherwise and destroyed that unity through the schism of a London asset planted in a Russian-American sect, which had infiltrated the Church inside Russia via certain extremely naïve senior hierarchs of that Church. This destruction was at the same time aided by a wave of Russian nationalism, which meant that the Russian Church suicidally lost the loyalty of Ukrainians, Moldovans, Western people and almost all who are not Russian. The international period of the New Martyrs and Confessors had been renounced by its bishop-politicians. Since the ‘Russian’ Diaspora in Western Europe is based not on Russians, but on the above Non-Russian national groups, Ukrainians, Moldovans and Western people, the divided Russian Church will not be able to lead in the reconstruction of the Local Church.

Although quality can be more important than quantity, until about 1965, most Western Europeans would have looked to the Russian Church to lead any possible restoration of a future Western European Local Church, simply because Russians were the majority Orthodox nationality there. From 1965 until about 2015, most would have looked to the Greek Patriarchate of Constantinople, since they in turn had become the majority. Today, after the influx of well over four million young Romanians and Moldovans with EU Romanian passports into Western Europe since 2007 and the births of their children here and the organisation of a Romanian Church structure with ten bishops (and more to come), we look to the Church of Romania to lead the way in uniting all Orthodox in a future Local Church. Is this realistic?

The Romanian and Russian Churches: Advantages and Disadvantages

The Romanian Orthodox Church, the second largest Local Orthodox Church, has certain advantages. Unlike the Constantinople and Russian Churches, it is in communion with all Orthodox, resisting the political extremes of cutting of communion and attacking the catholicity of the Church. Its language is a Latin language in the Western Latin alphabet, not unlike Italian. (From Roma to Romania?) And though Romania suffered under Communism, it was not so much that the Tradition of Orthodox Life and hesychastic life were destroyed, only suppressed for a time. But unlike the Westernised Greek Churches, it was only recently persecuted and produced many New Martyrs and Confessors. However, unlike the Russian Church, it was not so persecuted that it was virtually eliminated and became a convert Church, without living traditions.

The result is that most Romanian clergy generally see themselves as servants of the people and encourage popular participation in services together, opening the royal doors, reading the eucharistic canon aloud. This is helped because the Romanian Church celebrates the services in an accessible language. This is quite unlike the Russian Church, where clergy are all too often a professional caste separated from the people. Choirs are often professional and the services are cloaked in inaccessibility and in a 17th century language which is largely not understood. The result is that the people prefer Akathist hymns to Vespers and Matins. Akathists are written more or less in Russian and all can sing the simple melody. Similarly, Russian piety prefers services of intercession and memorial services to the complex liturgical cycle.

This inaccessibility is the result of the State-run bureaucratic clericalism introduced by Emperor Peter I after 1700, with its purely subjective and favouritising system of civil service awards, is most obvious in the withholding of communion. This means the very rigid insistence of most Russian priests on confession before communion, although, hypocritically, they do not do that for themselves. However, this Protestant-style State domination of the Church, copied from the Netherlands by Peter I, leads to the ritualistic and militaristic ethos in the Russian Church. This is unlike in any of the other Local Churches, from which it has been very isolated for centuries. For some the Russian Church is only about standing through services, dressed like an army in a particular ‘uniform’, which is specific to Russians, not to all Orthodox.

The Russian Church also excluded itself from the local assembles of Orthodox bishops, at long last organised in 2009 throughout the 12 regions of the Orthodox Diaspora. True, these assemblies have not become popular, on account of their political and completely undemocratic domination by the Greek Patriarchate of Constantinople and their lack of transparency, refusing for example to publish the minutes of their meetings. This means that most Orthodox have no idea that they even exist and do not feel involved in them in any way. Nevertheless, they do exist. However, Russian self-exclusion from them means that all the other Orthodox, Greeks, Romanians, Antiochians, Serbs etc are slowly starting to forge local Diaspora unity without the Russians. This is the path towards new Local Churches. Self-exclusion is a great mistake.

Nevertheless, the Romanian Church like any other does have its weaknesses. For instance, a few of its clergy have a reputation for love of money which compromises the principles of Orthodoxy and those clergy in the eyes of the faithful affected. However, its greatest weakness may be Romanian nationalism. This is a State Church, like the Church of Greece. If it follows in the suicidal footsteps of Russian and Greeks and falls into nationalism, it will fail to transmit the Orthodox Faith to succeeding, locally-born generations, who are integrated in all ways into the local culture. Then, like the Russian Church over the last fifty years and the Greek Church today, it will have to bury its last priests and sell off its empty churches, as we have witnessed so often in the Russian Church and recently the Greek Church since the 1970s.

The Future Local Orthodox Church of Western Europe

In our context, Western Europe can be defined as the 22 countries of ex-Catholic and ex-Protestant Europe, the exceptions being in countries in the east of the Western half of Europe. In order of size, these countries are: Germany, the UK, France, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands, Belgium, Sweden, Portugal, Austria, Switzerland, Denmark, Norway, Finland, Ireland, Luxembourg, Malta, Iceland, Andorra, Liechtenstein, Monaco and San Marino. They speak twelve different national languages. Thus, in this list we exclude countries outside Western Europe, in Central and Eastern Europe, such as the Baltic States, Poland, Hungary, Czechia, Slovakia and ex-Yugoslavia. These have historically been canonically dependent or dominated by Local Churches, like the Serbian, the Polish, the Czechoslovak, the Romanian and the Russian.

Initially, as we already suggested in our report of 1988, called ‘Vision or Dream’ a regional but multinational Metropolia could be established. This would be based in Paris and have six regional Archdioceses, set up around Western Europe. Perhaps, in the long term, even if it is quite far ahead of us, each could become the foundation for a future Local Church, once other smaller Local Churches have entered into co-operation with the majority Romanian Church and its suggested structures. However, initially, this would look as follows: A Metropolitan of Paris and All Western Europe, First Hierarch of the Orthodox Church of Western Europe, with, initially, a Synod of 24 bishops. This would be made up of 6 archbishops and 18 bishops. They would look after over six million Orthodox of various nationalities who live in Western Europe.

Gallia:

One Archbishop and three bishops with titles in France, Wallonia, French Switzerland and Monaco, representing Romanian, Greek, Russian, Serbian, Moldovan, Ukrainian etc

Italia:

One Archbishop and three bishops with titles in Northern Italy and San Marino; Central Italy; Southern Italy and Malta, representing Romanian, Moldovan, Greek, Russian, Ukrainian, Serbian etc

Iberia:

One Archbishop and three bishops with titles in Spain; Catalonia, the Basque Country and Andorra; Portugal, representing Romanian, Moldovan, Greek, Russian, Serbian, Ukrainian etc

Germania:

One Archbishop and three bishops with titles in Germany; Switzerland and Liechtenstein; Austria; the Netherlands, Flanders and Luxembourg, representing Greek, Russian, Romanian, Serbian, Moldovan, Ukrainian etc

Iona (Isles of the North Atlantic):

One Archbishop and three bishops with titles in England; Ireland; Scotland; Wales, representing Romanian, Greek, Moldovan, Russian, Serbian, Ukrainian etc

Scandinavia:

One Archbishop and three bishops with titles in Sweden; Denmark and the Faeroes; Finland; Norway and Iceland, representing Romanian, Serbian, Russian, Greek, Moldovan, Ukrainian etc

We suggest that the Archbishop of the Archdiocese of each region be chosen from the majority Orthodox nationality living in that region. Each regional Archdiocese should, if possible, have a bishop for other Orthodox peoples present, forming a kind of local Synod. When a new Metropolitan has to be chosen, every bishop in each regional Synod should have a vote. Clearly, with time, there would be bishops from local nationalities, Spanish, German, English, French etc. All bishops would be at least bilingual, if not trilingual. With time, the number of bishops would probably increase, according to local needs and the nationalities represented. This is what we have tried to do on a miniature and modest level in our parish, with three priests representing and respecting each nationality, calendars and customs.

 

Half a Century in the Orthodox Church in Western Europe (1)

Introduction: Nothing New Under the Sun

Apart from one year in Greece and several months in the Soviet Union, and then in Russia and the Ukraine, with brief visits to Orthodox in Moldova, Romania, Belarus, Czechia, Slovakia, Finland, Serbia and Bulgaria, I have spent 51 years as an Orthodox Christian in Western Europe, 41 of them as an Orthodox clergyman in Western Europe, in France, Portugal and England, but with liturgical celebrations in Belgium, Switzerland, Austria and Germany. My conclusions?

First of all, there is nothing new under the sun. This is because human nature does not change. Anyone who reads the Acts of the Apostles or the writings of the Church Fathers from the first centuries knows that all the difficulties and scandals of today have already occurred in the past. Of 80,000 Orthodox priests, I have perhaps met perhaps 1,000 and of the 1,000 Orthodox bishops, I have met about 100. I have never seen anything new compared to the past.

Seven Local Churches exist in the Western European Diaspora today: the Romanian, the Greek (Constantinople), the Russian (divided into three parts, one of which refuses to be in communion with another, so is in fact in schism, as well as the 100 new but independent parishes of the canonical Ukrainian Orthodox Church), the Serbian, and then the three very small groups under the Churches of Antioch, Bulgaria and Georgia. Only the three first big Churches carry any weight in terms of the Diaspora Church as a whole.

The Three Big Churches in 1976

Fifty years ago, there were two Russian bishops in this country. As they were both Russian, they were, naturally, at daggers drawn and out of communion with one another. One was an anthroposophist (look it up), a great eccentric who believed in Atlantis. The other one was a notorious womaniser. A few English people were allowed to join the two Russian groups, usually provided that they learned some Russian. This was because both groups were rapidly dying out (1917, after which most of the still living but elderly Russians had come here, was nearly sixty years before 1976). Priests, very few of them lived outside London and they were also elderly, spent much of their time doing funerals.

Fifty years ago, the Patriarchate of Constantinople in this country was dominated by Greek Cypriots, whose lives were largely devoted to Hellenism. Most had arrived here between 1950 and 1974. A homosexual archbishop preferred to ordain his boyfriends and one of his vicar-bishops was a pedophile, who at that time got away with it. Of course, there was at least one bishop who was excellent and many very virtuous priests and pious people. However, the opening to non-Greeks was all but non-existent. From the archbishop down, English people were told to go away, at best being told to join the Church of England or else to learn Greek, ‘if you want to become a Greek’, at worst being told to ‘go away’ by one Cypriot priest, only in the most vulgar way possible in the English language.

Fifty years ago, the Romanian Church was more or less inexistent, as the whole country was controlled by the Romanian Secret Police.

The Three Big Churches in 2026

Today, the Russians remain in small groups here, small because they have all failed to pass on the Faith to locally-born children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren and so on. No Russian group has learned how to cope with assimilation. Today, the larger (still small) group is 100% attached to the Russian Federation, politically and in all other ways, and is much compromised by scandals. The smaller group, dominated by American Trumpians, just encourages the crazies and so spawns old calendarists, just as the Russian Church inside Russia once spawned old ritualists, and is much compromised by appalling scandals. Another even smaller group just hangs on. All three groups are dying out – for all have survived largely because of immigration from Moldova. By far the saddest thing about the Russian Church is that it did not learn from history and so it has condemned itself to repeat the same mistakes as before the Revolution. Today, inside the ex-Soviet Union, the Russian Church strangely resembles the pre-Revolutionary Russian Church, with the same politicisation, the same militarisation, the same empty ritualism, the same inhuman rigidity, the same pharisaic and blind repetition that only they are ‘canonical’, the same blind obedience to the hierarchy and the State, regardless of Christ and His teaching.

Today, the Greek Patriarchate of Constantinople in this country, although still dominated by Greek Cypriots whose lives are largely devoted to Hellenism, has a very dynamic archbishop, whose English is better than his Greek, and who is desperately trying to save his archdiocese from self-extinction despite his elderly flock. As he said to us a few months ago, he has one hundred priests who are so old that they are likely to die within the next five years and three candidates to replace them. For forty years the previous administration ignored all the warnings that this would happen. The saddest thing about the Greek Church is that they did not learn from the suicide of the Russian Church, so they are condemned to repeat the same suicide and also die out.

The Romanian Patriarchate is today by far the largest Church as a result of the immigration of four to five million Romanians and Moldovans here over the last 20 years. Overall, our two Autonomous Romanian Orthodox Metropolias in Western Europe have 10 bishops, 1,283 churches and 30 monasteries, which makes them by far the largest Local Church in Western Europe. We are about four times larger than the Greek Patriarchate of Constantinople in Western Europe, five times larger than the Russian Church in Western Europe (most of which is composed of Romanian-speaking Moldovans) and incomparably larger than the tiny ROCOR and Antiochian dioceses, both with less than 100, mainly tiny (between 10 and 50 people), communities.

Conclusion: The Challenge for the Romanian Church

Between 1917 and 1962 by far the largest Diaspora Church in Western Europe, albeit divided into three warring groups, was the Russian Church. Between 1962 and 2007 by far the largest was the Patriarchate of Constantinople. But they both lost their dominating positions and indeed the respect of others, the Russians through their isolationist totalitarian politics, which excludes Non-Russians, and their lack of communion with others, the Greeks through their sheer racism. Today some 85% of Orthodox here are Romanian or Moldovan. Can the Romanians, now by far the biggest group, keep their position and the respect of others?

The Romanian Church has many devout clergy and people. It has the Carpathian spirit of solidarity. We are together in the Romanian Church, this is the People’s Church, with a sense of community, family and friendship. The Romanian language is a Latin language, written in the Latin alphabet. There is neither the politics, nor the military-style rigidity of the Russians, nor the racism of the Greeks. Moreover, and most importantly, the Romanian Church alone is in communion with everyone, in schism with no-one. However, the Romanian Church still faces two great challenges.

The first weakness of the Romanian Church, at least in Romania, is the temptation of money. Any Romanian layperson will tell you of a bad experience in Romania with a member of the clergy who demanded money from them. This is why some Romanians have become Protestants. I have not seen this temptation in the Romanian Diaspora, but we cannot be complacent. The second weakness of the Romanian Church is the potential lack of openness to others, in other words, the weakness of nationalism. To found a new Local Church in the Diaspora means to be open to others, to warring Greeks and Russians in particular, to be able to co-operate with others in a common language, accepting different languages, calendars and customs, and not imposing one’s own. Is this possible? Will it too fail to learn from history and repeat the errors of the Russians, repeated by the Greeks? We await the inevitable verdict of the history of the future.

 

 

After Globalist Davos: Will All Globalist Organisations Now Also Collapse?

‘It may be dangerous to be America’s enemy, but to be America’s friend is fatal’.

Henry Kissinger

The current President of the USA may yet be removed from office either for insanity or else as a result of his poor physical health. We have only ever seen such narcissistic egomania and amoralism once before and that was in the case of a psychically deranged American bishop. In the meantime, however, Trump goes from his failed US proxy war against Russia in the Ukraine, which now faces military, economic and political collapse, to genocide in Gaza, to Caribbean piracy and murdering fishermen, to kidnapping the President of Venezuela, to a failed regime coup operation in Iran, to threatening Canada and Western Europe with tariffs because he wants to invade Greenland, to a disastrously failed ‘Board of Peace’ attempt to dissolve the United Nations, and to murdering his own citizens through his masked Gestapo Police.

At Davos the Prime Minster of Canada admitted that ‘the rules-based international order’ had indeed only even been a myth, a ‘narrative’, which justified the Western world’s grabbing of whatever it wanted from the rest of the world and sharing in the spoils. From Iraq to Venezuela, it had always been obvious. Nothing new here, except that a Globalist banker publicly admitted it. Also the President of the Ukraine, sent by Ukrainian oligarchs to garner even more lucre from stupid Europeans, had yet another spoilt child tantrum of entitlement. As usual, he vilified Europe for not giving him everything he wanted and received a standing ovation from the crawling Europeans. Nothing new here either, except that what was true all along has become undeniable.

Davos meetings always assembled Globalist oligarchs and promoted their ideology. However, the ‘battle’ for Greenland in January 2026 destroyed their ideology. The Europeans had thought that President Trump was bluffing about Greenland, for the idea of war between the USA and Europe was unthinkable to them. Instead, the American President deployed his favourite tool and threatened to levy import tariffs on Europe, with threats to raise them, in order to pressure the Danish government to give Greenland up. That was enough. The cowardly European NATO appeasers, who despise international law, compromised and forced little Denmark to give Greenland to the USA, piece by piece. It will be called ‘The Greenland Purchase’.

In retaliation, the Europeans are scurrying to Beijing, as the Canadians have already done. Will some of them sheepishly began crawling to Moscow, pleading for the gas and oil from which they had cut themselves off, and will some even apologise for supporting the Ukraine, hypocritically blaming the Americans? At the Russian request, Europeans and Canadians may yet leave NATO, giving an excuse to Americans, who will be all too happy to leave their NATO bases in Europe, Ramstein, Lakenheath, Aviano etc. Globalist NATO may duly be dispatched into the dustbin of history. The Europeans may gleefully begin to prosecute American tech giants like Google, Meta, Tesla and X and the Chinese would be happy to provide Baidu, BYD, Huawei and others instead.

By spring 2026 the Globalist regime in Kiev may collapse. New representatives in Kiev could sign a peace treaty acknowledging the long-awaited return to Russia of Novorossiya, that is, of Crimea, Lugansk, Donetsk, Zaporozhia, Kherson, Nikolaev, Odessa, Dnepro, Kharkov, and guaranteeing human rights to Russian speakers elsewhere. As we predicted in 2022, two and a half far western provinces may be returned to Poland (Lviv, Ivano-Frankivsk and western Ternopil), one to Romania (North Bukovina) and one divided between Slovakia and Hungary (Zakarpat’e). The New Ukraine, demilitarised and renamed Kievska Rus, could consist of Kiev and eleven and a half provinces of the Soviet Ukraine. The evils done by Lenin and Stalin would at last be undone.

After the collapse of the Globalist NATO, its Globalist economic and political wing, the EU, may also begin to collapse. Former EU members, starting in central and south-eastern Europe, could leave the EU and join BRICS. followed by south-western Europe, Italy, Spain, Portugal. The EU would be left in tatters and dissolve itself. Meanwhile, Europeans may cancel orders with US defence contractors and begin placing orders with local producers like Rheinmetall, BAE Systems and SAAB. However, even small orders would take years to be designed and delivered and costs would overrun. Nobody would admit it, but everyone would wish that they could get back everything they had earlier given away to the Ukraine, where it was immediately destroyed by Russian arms.

Meanwhile, following Ukrainian-style corruption scandals at last made public, the peoples of the three Baltic States, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, may yet topple their old American elites and replace them with democrats. These would restore to their Russian minorities their human rights and restore Russian and Soviet historical monuments, hoping for desperately needed Russian investments in their deindustrialised and depopulated statelets. After referenda, the vast majority of Moldovans may return to Romania, though small parts in the east and south would join Russia and small numbers in the north join Kievska Rus. As for Finland and Sweden, like Switzerland, they too could overthrow their American elites and return to neutrality.

Prudently biding its time, China would be the last to act. In late 2026 it could blockade Taiwan, which would capitulate within weeks. Most Taiwanese would rejoice at long-awaited national reunion with the Motherland and the coming economic boom and investments in infrastructure. As the world enters 2027, the new geopolitical landscape would be unrecognisable. America’s occupation of islands and peninsulas in East Asia and in Oceania, as throughout Eurasia and Africa, would be over. The Philippines, South Korea, Japan and Australia would stop being American vassals – the failure of the bankrupt ($40 trillion) United States to defend Taiwan would sober them and they could all made friends with China, signing trade deals and demilitarising.

Viewed from outside, America’s One Hemisphere policy (in fact, One North-West quarter-sphere) would be a failure for the isolationist US elite. True, they might have their united Northern America, but not a united North America, since Mexico, let alone the rest of Latin America, would have nothing to do with ‘Gringo’ ‘Trumpland’, and would resist its imperialism. Turned inwards, the US elite would not see its failure. After all, in the North, Greenland could be absorbed as the 51st American State and then Canada might begin to crumble into US hands province by province. And so after four years in power, Trump could transform the world, though in reality he would only have acted as a catalyst in hastening the inevitable decomposition of the Western world.

 

 

 

The New World Order and Orthodox Christianity

Eurasia

In 2026 we have finally entered the real New World Order. Afro-Eurasia, including the Ukraine and Western Europe, is now being freed of the last remnants of the European and American colonial empires. Asia, by far the greatest and most populous Continent (over 60% of the world’s people) is being separated into North Asia (also called Eurasia, and eventually to include its Western European tip), led by Russia; East Asia, led by China; South Asia, led by India; and West Asia, which will be led by the Islamic world, once it has been freed from US-Israeli divide and rule policies and begins to work together.

After the US defeats in Eurasia, in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan and a few days ago, in Iran, where it was frightened off by its advanced missiles, the Americans are scurrying back to the Western hemisphere and a first adventure in Venezuela, kidnapping the President and his wife. With the US leaving Eurasia, France too is being thrown out of its last footholds in Africa by Russia. It is clear that Africa and Eurasia are being freed, despite hesitations in the South Korean peninsula, on the island of Taiwan, in parts of Thailand, in the settler colony of Israel and in the north-western tip of the peninsula known as ‘Europe’.

Europe and the Rest of the World

Some ask why it is the tiny Baltic States in ‘Europe’ which are so opposed to being part of Russian-led North Asia. It is because its US-imposed elites are the last converts to the obsolete Western Establishment ideology that ‘the West is Best’. The UK left the EU – the Baltics are fanatics for it. For as recent converts, these Eastern European neophytes are more Western than the West, ‘more royalist than the King’, as the French say. They are the last believers in Western superiority, together with the tiny number of its ideologues of the Western European elite. Western people have never believed in their elitist nonsense.

As for Africa, it is separating into Northern and Islamic Africa and Southern and Christian Africa. Then there is Oceania with its very large territory but tiny population, dominated by Australia, whose economy is now largely dependent on China and East Asia. It too has already moved away from the UK and the USA. Finally, there are the Americas, or ‘the Western Hemisphere’, dominated by the USA, which is separated into Northern and largely English-speaking America, and Southern or Latin, largely Spanish- and Portuguese-speaking America. The latter has yearned for generations to liberate itself from Yankee oppression.

Greenland

However, Latin America is now breaking free from US domination. For the USA is too busy absorbing Greenland and may be too busy trying to absorb Canada. After all, Greenland is the Western shield of the USA and once it has been absorbed, Canada will be surrounded. Tiny colonialist Denmark and weakling Europe, whose self-styled Napoleonic leader, Macron, sports dark glasses to cover his black eye, given him by his husband, will not defend the colonial anachronism of Greenland. In 1974 NATO Turkey invaded Cyprus and NATO Greece and the rest of NATO did absolutely nothing. Why would they act now?

Trump’s interest is to end European colonies in North America through taking Greenland. His excuse? The waters around Greenland are infested by Russian and Chinese ships – invisible to everyone else. If Europe expels the USA from its bases in Europe, Trump will be only too pleased to end NATO – and also to distract from Epstein. The European Globalist banker leaders will simply appease Trump, as they did Hitler in the 1930s. Yes, Trump is prepared to go to war to obtain the Nobel Peace Prize. In this distraction, Kiev oligarchs argue and Russia cuts off power in the Ukraine, copying the tactics of the USA in Serbia.

Although Greenland is much smaller than shown on absurd world maps, it is still twice the size of California, currently the largest state of the USA. However, unlike ‘the sunshine state’, with a population some 750 times greater than Greenland’s, Greenland is covered in very thick ice. Possibly, if you knew where to drill down through hundreds of metres of ice, some useful minerals could be found. But that would make them very expensive minerals. The Greenland block of ice is rapidly turning into the block of ice that sank the Titanic, only this time this Titanic is the sinking ship of relations between the USA and Western Europe.

Europe’s Weakness

Trump wants to seize Greenland in a land grab vanity project. It is inhabited by 55,000 people who live in peace and do not want to be invaded, but that is OK with Europe. However, when Russia invaded the Ukraine, inhabited by huge numbers of ethnic Russian Ukrainians, who asked to be invaded, or rather, ‘liberated’ by Russia, since they were being genocided by an illegal, anti-democratic, Fascistic, US-installed regime in Kiev, that was not OK. Hypocritical double standards have morally discredited the Western world so much that the phrase ‘Western values’ has now become a subject for worldwide laughter.

Trump saw European weakness, when they called him ‘Daddy’. So he decided to take European territory in a repeat of US Independence from Europe in 1776, 250 years ago. The Europeans have brought this on themselves. The Germans allowed the Americans and their proxies (Russian-hating Danes among them) to blow up the Nordstream pipeline, so they would become dependent on overpriced US liquified gas. Russia never cut Europeans off from Russian gas. The Americans did. Now the Europeans have no Russian gas and, if they defy the Americans in Greenland, they will also lose American gas. Karma for Denmark.

Orthodox Christianity

We have for now entered a Tripolar World of China, the USA and Russia. The last of these is, nominally, Orthodox Christian. All the prophecies agree that its present leader will be succeeded by a Tsar. After various Orthodox peoples, like the Ukrainians, the Belarussians, the Baltics etc have at last received their inevitable Church independence (Autocephaly), this Tsar will still directly represent over 50% of all Orthodox. Then at last authentic Orthodox missionary work can begin. At present, this is not possible, as the Russian Church, once captive to Soviet atheism, is now captive to extreme Russian nationalism.

Russian nationalism openly and publicly rejects, sometimes very aggressively, all Non-Russian Orthodox. They complain how for decades they have been treated like third-class citizens by Russians. In fact, the Russian Church is now in schism with other parts of the Orthodox Christian world. However, it has also alienated many other Orthodox, in the Ukraine, Moldova, Belarus, Kazakhstan, the Baltics and throughout the Orthodox world. It will need a Tsar to reverse the disastrous clericalism, ritualism, militarism and nationalism that so disfigure today’s Russian Church, which is lost in the labyrinth of these post-Soviet deviations.

 

 

The Collapse of the Globalists?

Russia hoped for a swift end to the genocide of Russians in the Ukraine by demilitarising and denazifying the illegal and Fascistic Kiev regime. Instead, after April 2022 Russia was obliged by the West to demilitarise and denazify the whole of the West, changing its racist and imperialist mentalities. The latter had depleted its weapon stocks and treasuries, sending so much of what it had to Kiev. Today, at last, although Kiev is running out of Ukrainian men, Ukrainian men are running out of the Ukraine. They do not want to die for a corrupt oligarchic regime. Russian victory is coming.

As a result, the EU and the UK are now in crisis. The unelected head of the EU has again faced a vote of no confidence. The French government has collapsed again and its disruptive narcissistic President, the Rothschild Macron, may have to resign, to the relief of the people he has bankrupted and the Sovereignist National Rally Party. In Britain there seems only to be hatred for the puppet Starmer, the bankers’ candidate, chosen by the oligarchs mainly on account of his Jewish wife and children. The UK Opposition, the 200-year-old Conservative Party, has all but disappeared beneath the tide of the Sovereignist Reform Party. In Germany the militaristic Blackrock Chancellor Merz, is just as unpopular as Starmer and Macron, even though he is trying to forbid the German Sovereignist AfD Opposition.

In Italy Meloni looks as though she could be replaced by the Sovereignist Salvini. The new Polish and Czech governments are realists, not ideologues, and are gradually dropping their support for Kiev. A Georgescu government in Romania would have done the same, only it was banned by the EU, and the EU only won in Moldova because of its massive electoral corruption. Meanwhile, although corrupt pro-EU cliques are still in power in Armenia and Azerbaijan and UK elites are trying to corrupt Bosnia and Kazakhstan, the democratically-elected government in Georgia has held firm against the latest EU attempt at regime change. In Canada, there is repression, as in Switzerland and Britain, where they want digital ID. Authoritarian, police-state movements are in power everywhere in the West.

In the other part of the Western world, the still neocon-controlled USA, there is bankruptcy and chaos, with threats of disastrous new wars against Iran, Venezuela and the Russia – wars of fanatics on three continents at the same time. However, National Sovereignist (Populist) leaders are challenging the old post-World War II order, with leaders like Trump in the USA, Orban in Hungary and Fico in Slovakia. Thus, Orban has rejected the EU euro currency, as he considers that it is dead. For them the future of South-Eastern Europe is with BRICS. Many consider that both the EU and NATO are doomed.